|
|||
|
Some of the paradoxes of complexity Complexity science is highly paradoxical. As you study
the world through a complexity lens you will be continually confronted with 'both-and'
rather than 'either-or' thinking. The paradoxes of complexity are that both sides of many
apparent contradictions are true. |
||
Aides Principles |
The first of these
paradoxes is that the systemic nature of a CAS implies interdependence yet each of the
elements which are interdependent are able to act independently. Interdependence and
independence co-exist. Another paradox in complexity is that simple patterns of interaction can create huge
numbers of potential outcomes. Simplicity leads to complexity. CAS operate in a
context that is frequently unpredictable; not merely unknown but unknowable. Yet it is the
agents' propensity to predict based on schema of local conditions that allow them to act
in an apparently coherent manner. |
||
|
Complexity science is the
study of living systems but living systems die. As a metaphor associated with life,
it needs to encompass all aspects of the life cycle. Death is part of this cycle. The
traditional management literature's depiction of the life cycle begins at birth and ends
at decline. Complexity also includes the study of death and renewal. |
||
Aides |
Complexity is a
metaphor |
||
|
Complexity science presents a contrast to the dominant scientific and organizational metaphor and thereby challenges us to see what other questions we can ask about the systems we are studying or living within. The metaphor of systems as mechanical or 'machines' has shaped our studies in physics, biology, economics, medicine and organizations. Complexity is about reframing our understanding of many systems by using a metaphor associated with life and living systems rather than machines or mechanical systems. Viewing the world through a complexity lens means understanding the world from biological concepts. |
||
|