|
||||
|
Wicked
Questions Surfacing Differences Brenda Zimmerman,
Wicked questions are used to expose the
assumptions which we hold about an issue or situation. Articulating these assumptions
provides an opportunity to see the patterns of thought and surface the differences in a
group. These patterns and differences can be used to discover common ground or to find
creative alternatives for stubborn problems. Wicked questions invite participation in both forming
the questions and searching for solutions to address them. |
|||
|
||||
|
Wicked questions do not have an obvious answer.
They are used to expose the assumptions which shape our actions and choices. They are
questions that articulate the embedded and often contradictory assumptions we hold about
an issue, context or organization. A question is 'wicked' if there is an embedded paradox
or tension in the question. The embedded tension or paradox is an opportunity to tune to
edge of chaos. This is an area of great creativity and innovation. A wicked question is not a trick question. With a trick
question, someone knows the answer. Wicked questions do not have obvious answers. Their
value lies in their capacity to open up options, inquiry and surface the fundamental
issues that need to be addressed. The paradoxes or tensions are often found in the
implicit assumptions we hold about a context, issue or person. Exposing these assumptions
in a question is often both uncomfortable and a relief. It is uncomfortable because the
myths we create to bury our assumptions often seem more acceptable and defensible. They
are the right thing to say. For example, it is popular today to talk about empowered
front-line people. But in many cases, these words are not really accurate. We have created
policies or procedures, such as needing supervisory approval for minor expenditures, which
are the antithesis of empowerment. |
|||
|
Wicked questions invite
participation in both forming the questions and searching for solutions to address them.
Leaders can create the questions which can be used to promote a search for local
solutions. They can be used to create the conditions for inquiry and innovation at all
levels of the organization.
|
|||
Before using this aide: Is there
sufficient trust in the group to expose assumptions? Will people feel safe to express the
paradoxes and tensions which exist? After using this aide: How will the group use
the question(s) to continue the process of searching for alternatives? How will the
questions be shared with others? Which questions will be explored further? Why?
One comprehensive example of using wicked
questions is in the tale "Make it Happen or Let it Happen". This tale is from
outside the health care field. The organization, Federal Metals (or Fedmet), is a metals
distributor. The senior management team of Fedmet were concerned that traditional
strategic planning did not promote continuous inquiry and challenge. Instead, they felt it
limited the strategic thinking to a few senior members of the organization. To create the
conditions for emergence of strategic options throughout the organization, they ended
their traditional annual strategic planning document with a series of wicked questions.
These questions did not have obvious answers. The wicked questions were an invitation for
everyone in the organization to participate in finding solutions to complex problems. In the tale "Emerges from the Fabric", Linda
Rusch uses wicked questions as a method to make the undiscussable discussable - to
articulate the issues which people are thinking but not saying to each other - at least in
the official meetings. One organization I worked with used the wicked
questions as an ongoing process. The wicked questions were posted on a wall in a common
area of the offices. They stayed up for about six weeks after the original session. Sheets
of paper and markers were left by the wall and people were invited to add to the
questions, move them, and create their own. The wall was near the coffee area and people
would chat about the questions while they were getting their coffee. People in the
organization talked about the issues and shared ideas for potential action opportunities.
There was no stated agenda or specific meeting times allocated to this activity. It
emerged from the wall, the questions and the connections created. |
||||
|
||||
|
Goldstein describes processes of inquiry which
can be used to promote creativity, information flow and self-organization. He discusses
Brenda Zimmerman's analysis of the wicked questions process at Fedmet but also provides
examples of other inquiry processes. Difference questioning was originally used to deal
with 'stuck problems' in dysfunctional families, and can be used as a method to expose
differences in organizational settings. Goldstein extends difference questioning to look
at cultural difference questioning and purpose contrasting. Purpose contrasting creates a
stretch between what you say your work is all about and what you actually do. |
|||
Next | Previous | Return to Contents List Copyright ©> 2000, Brenda J.
Zimmerman. Schulich School of Business, |