|
||||
A
Clinical Problem as Genetic Algorithm Game: Beginnings of an effort to use computational tools
of complexity for clinical improvement |
||||
Told
by: Brenda Zimmerman and Curt Lindberg Illustration of:
|
||||
At a meeting to discuss
caesarean section rates in their community, Stephen Larned, Vice President for Medical
Affairs at Maine Medical Center, began to see links between the topic of the meeting and
the presentation he had heard by John Holland at a VHA conference the week before on
genetic algorithms and modeling. "What if we frame the
caesarean section problem as a game for genetic algorithms? The objective of the game is
to have the lowest caesarean section rate. The pieces of the puzzle are the expectant
mother and her attitudes, maybe those of her family, thirty different obstetricians, five
different ways of managing pain, two or three different ways of managing induction, the
stage of the nurses shift, etc. You multiply all those variables together and you
get 45,000 different ways of managing one patient." Larned looked for a partner in
this endeavor and found a doctor who had developed software using concepts from neural
networks and genetic algorithms to address clinical care options in a mental health
hospital. Larned invited his colleagues to meet with this doctor to discuss the
softwares potential application to the caesarean section problem. The software required a
definable input, a definable output and a large supply of experience. For most of the
management challenges at Maine Medical Center the software would not be useful because
these requirements are not met. However, Larned argued, the requirements were met for some
of the clinical challenges including reducing the number of unnecessary caesarean
sections. "The argument is that there are non-linear links between some of the input
variables that will not be obvious to us." The software is intended to help one see
the interdependencies or non-linear links. Larned saw this as an opportunity to intervene
at the system at the point of greatest leverage. Larned had not had a chance to
implement the software to the caesarean section problem yet. He was excited by its
potential for a clinical improvement but also for learning more about complexity.
For the last several
months, Larned had been facilitating monthly meetings with colleagues interested in
complexity. Much of their discussions had been on the management side of health care. Over
time, there developed a core group of people who were reading and thinking about
complexity science. The people who attended the genetic algorithm presentation were not
members of this core group. Larned saw this as an opportunity to attract new people to the
complexity perspective. "One of the things
thats so exciting is this would be a quantitative hard core clinical application.
That would be extremely gratifying. The core issue is how to provide care in a better
way."
|
||||
Next | Previous | Return to top Copyright © 2001, Brenda Jane
Zimmerman and Curt Lindberg. Permission |