|
|||
Helping Others to Learn About Complexity: CAS and Learning In a CAS, agents operate
according to their own internal strategies or mental models. Each agent can have its own
"rules" for how to respond to things in its environment; each agent can have its
own interpretations of events. Agents can share mental models, or be totally
individualistic. Further, agents can change their mental models. Because agents can both
change themselves and share mental models, a CAS can learn; it's behavior can adapt over
time. Learning, therefore, is an
emergent property of a CAS; it does not need to be imposed or controlled from outside the
system. At the same time, we must also acknowledge that although we all live in many CAS,
not all of us learn deeply about complexity from simply being a part of what is going on
all around us. So, while we cannot force learning to happen, we can certainly take actions
that make learning more likely to occur. The Nine Emerging Principles of
Complexity (described elsewhere in this Resource Kit) give us insight into the conditions
that promote learning in a CAS.
We could make similar points
from the other principles of complexity. The more we understand about CAS, the more we
understand about how to help others to learn about CAS.
Our understandings (and, as we
shall see, our misunderstandings) about learning are profoundly influenced by the
unconscious metaphors we use to understand organizations - the machine and military
metaphors. You will see these metaphors underlying most of the training and education you
have taken part in. If an organization is a machine, then learning is about installing a
"program" - the right knowledge, the right way to do things. If an organization
is a military unit, then learning is about repeating drills to demonstrate the right way,
following the directions, and developing discipline. Of course, the activities of most
organizational training sessions are more subtle than the exaggerated picture we have just
painted. Nevertheless, see if you do not agree that the list of traditional assumptions
behind classroom learning (top of figure 1) rings true both for your own experience and
the machine/military metaphor. The bottom line is that most of our experience
of learning within organizations is inconsistent with what we know about CAS. |
|||
Next | Previous | Return to Contents List Copyright © 2001, Paul E.
Plsek & Associates, |