lessons from the edge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa503/fa50384f805d9e415974f8310241a262bf35ba2b" alt=""
“Closing Commentary”
In which
Gareth Morgan summed it all up, and Tom Petzinger “wowed” the crowd with
a spontaneous, written remembrance of the conference
Facilitated by by
Tom Petzinger and Gareth Morgan
- Tom Petzinger
“interviewed” the participants, and took notes on their responses. Next,
he asked whether the conference was successful. Everyone agreed it was.
He then introduced Gareth Morgan to do a “professional” summing up while
Tom disappeared to write the column. (Note that his column appears
after these following Gareth Morgan notes.)
Morgan’s five major misconceptions of complexity
- Misconception
#1. “Thank God I only have to do 15%!” Simply
doing 15% doesn’t let you off the hook. Don’t celebrate over the 85%
you don’t have to do. Rather, find the 15% that makes a difference!
- Misconception
#2. “It’s mere metaphor.” Don’t dismiss complexity because it relies
so heavily on metaphors. Metaphor is one of the most powerful forces
creating and shaping meaning. Newton’s metaphor of the Universe as a
celestial machine had an enormous effect on society. Darwin’s “survival
of the fittest” is a metaphor that legitimized predatory capitalism.
That’s not “mere” metaphor. Systems thinking is a metaphor which states
that organisms and organizations exist in environments. These “mere
metaphors” have created enormous change.
There are dangers to metaphor. The danger occurs when we lose sight
that science is based on metaphor. All science is metaphor. However,
we’ve grown so used to those metaphors that people have taken it as
a literal description of reality.
- Misconception
#3. “Oh God! I forgot my specs!” Minspecs are not a series of rules
that must be memorized. The point is to create them when they’re needed.
Minspecs help you create boundaries to shape organizational efforts.
It’s a question of putting boundaries around a new system without limiting
it.
- Misconception
#4. “Oh I’ve got to go back and kick some buts!” Much has been said
about identifying the “buts” – the contradictions that can halt change.
Don’t go overboard addressing every “but.” If there are one or two contradictions
that embody all the others, you only need to address them, as with the
Pareto effect. It’s a question of digging and diving deep.
- Misconception
#5. “This complexity stuff is great! I’m going back to apply it to everything
I do!” Maybe the most important thing to remember is that complexity
science isn’t appropriate for all problems. It works best where there
are no clear answers. So you may actually create confusion if you use
it where a mechanical approach would be more appropriate.
Tom Petzinger’s live “Front Lines” column
- NOTE: This is
the column Tom Petzinger wrote at the close of the conference, based
upon his interview of the participants.
PRINCETON, N.J.—Can
health care save itself? It’s a question whose answer is unknowable,
but one whose very asking improves the probability of a favorable
outcome.
That, in any case, was the understanding that emerged from an extraordinary
meeting of health-care professionals here this week, a conference
called “Leading from the Edge of Chaos.” What, you might ask, is the
relevance of chaos to health care? “Life is chaos,” explained one
participant. Said another: “Health care is complex, but simple rules
may suffice.”
VHA Inc., with underwriting from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,
convened the two-day meeting at the Merrill Lynch Conference Center
in a teaching facility that inspired memories of a Psych 101 lecture
hall. (Contrary to erroneous reports in an earlier Front Lines column,
VHA does not stand for Veterans Hospital Administration.)
The meeting drew the participation of nearly 200 health care professional—nurses,
doctors, administrators and academics. The weenies from Risk Management
were nowhere in attendance, however.
The gathering opened with a presentation by Clint Sprott, who described
how nature, like health care, is extremely complex and unpredictable
in what it does, yet may be highly knowable through the laws by which
it does it.
Jeffrey Goldstein told a cautionary tale about the former Yugoslavia,
revealing to the conference for the first time the discovery of something
called the Tito Attractor.
Gareth Morgan described the power of metaphor and the virtue of paradox.
He suggested that health-care professionals can never manage the future
if they keep trying to predict it—but that they need to follow only
a few specifications to have a major impact on it.
Appearing with Mary Ann Keyes of Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center
and Tom Petzinger of The Wall Street Journal, Brenda Zimmerman reported
that action and theory can produce startlingly similar results, whether
the objective is baking bread or delivering antibiotics.
Ary Goldberger told the group that equilibrium, despite some popular
assumptions to the contrary, can equal death, while health essentially
is disorder. Asked whether his discovery would improve his odds of
career advancement, his superiors at Harvard Medical School declined
comment.
William Sulis turned the entire proceedings on their head. Instead
of arguing that natural systems can serve as metaphors for man-made
systems, he showed that a man-made system—a computer—can serve as
a metaphor for a living one, the brain.
On the second day the entire group self-organized into storytelling
sessions that variously revealed:
- how self-organizing
nurses, freed to follow their individual visions, can literally
distribute the hospital throughout the fabric of the community;
- how divergent
organizations can come together and grow a new culture in a way that
no one could ever plan;
- how an open
mind—and an open heart—can create a new space where creativity and
caring can grow.
Curt Lindberg
of VHA concluded the conference by distributing a thick three-ring binder
full of penetrating and original research materials— Edgeware, he called
it—a book that all by itself was worth the price of admission, particularly
as it contained several earlier Front Lines columns.
And so—as always, dear reader—your feedback is welcome. You can reach
me at tom@petzinger.com
|